The Influence of COVID-19 in Pennsylvania Rural Schools' Due Process Hearing Decisions

Authors

  • David Rush Holy Family University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2024.v14n1p30-48

Keywords:

Special Education Due Process Hearings, Rural Local Education Agencies, COVID-19

Abstract

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, rural Pennsylvania Local Education Agencies (LEAs) were found to have failed to properly offer special education services in alignment with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ranks among the most litigated states in disputes over the proper facilitation of services as mandated by IDEA. Despite this high volume of litigation, there was no analysis of how being defined as a rural LEA influenced due process hearing officer decisions after the COVID-19 Pandemic. The current study addresses this research gap by reviewing special education due process hearing activity for rural LEAs and comparing activity for the two years before and after the COVID-19 pandemic-mandated office closures. Findings offer guidance on problematic practices by analyzing the relationship between the pandemic and hearing officer ruling outcome, activity frequency before and after the pandemic, and remedies owed by rural LEAs from post-COVID decisions.

Author Biography

David Rush, Holy Family University

David Harold Rush, EdD, is a recent graduate of Holy Family University. His research interests include special education legal policies and universal design of learning standards. Dr. Rush passionately believes in advocating for the INDIVIDUAL in Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). He can be contacted at drush@holyfamily.edu for any questions or comments.

References

Blackwell, W. H., & Blackwell, V. V. (2015). A longitudinal study of Massachusetts special education due process hearings: Issues, representation, and student characteristics. Sage Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015577669

Blackwell, W. H., & Gomez, M. (2019). Independent educational evaluations as issues of dispute in special education due process hearings. Journal of Human Services: Training, Research, and Practice, 4(1), 1–23. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/jhstrp/vol4/iss1/2

Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education (2023). IDEA dispute resolution data summary for U.S. and Outlying Areas: 2011-12 to 2021-2022. https://www.cadreworks.org/sites/default/files/resources/2023%20National%20Data%20Summary%20FINAL%20-%20Accessible.pdf

Drescher, J., & Torrance, G. (2022, July 20). What is the status of educational opportunity in rural America? Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-is-the-status-of-educational-opportunity-in-rural-america/

Erickson, W. A., VanLooy, S., von Schrader, S., & Bruyère, S. M. (2018). Disability, income, and rural poverty. In D. Harley, N. Ysasi, M. Bishop & A. Fleming (Eds.), Disability and vocational rehabilitation in rural settings: Challenges to service delivery (pp.17–41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64786-9_2

Fairbanks, A. I., Jones, N. E., & Zirkel, P. A. (2021). Frequency trends in state complaint procedures under IDEA. West’s Education Law Reporter, 394, 440–454. https://www.cadreworks.org/sites/default/files/resources/SCP%20Frequency%20Trends%20Article%202021.pdf

Fuller, E., & Pendola, A. (2020). K-12 teacher supply, demand, and shortages in Pennsylvania. The Center for Rural Pennsylvania. https://www.rural.pa.gov/getfile.cfm?file=Resources/PDFs/research-report/PA-Teacher-Supply-Demand-Shortages-2020.pdf&view=true

Geverdt, D. (2019). Education demographic and geographic estimates program (EDGE): Locale boundaries file documentation, 2017 (NCES 2018-115). National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

Gutierrez, E., & Terrones, F. (2023). Small and sparse: Defining rural school districts for K-12 funding. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/Small%20and%20Sparse-Defining%20Rural%20School%20Districts%20for%20K%E2%80%9312%20Funding.pdf

Hoagland-Hanson, K. (2014). Getting their due (process): Parents and lawyers in special education due process hearings in Pennsylvania. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 163, 1805–1943. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24752827

Hott, B. L., Jones, B. A., Rodriguez, J., Brigham, F. J., Martin, A., & Mirafuentes, M. (2021). Are rural students receiving FAPE? A descriptive review of IEPs for students with social, emotional, or behavioral needs. Behavior Modification, 45(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445518825107

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004)

Karadimou, O. (2022). The benefits and challenges of rural special education teachers: improving teacher retention in rural districts [Poster presentation]. Old Dominion University, College of Education & Professional Studies, Norfolk, Virgina. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/gradposters2022_education/5

Kotok, S., & Kryst, E. L. (2017). Digital technology: A double-edged sword for a school principal in rural Pennsylvania. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 20(4), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458916685748

Kryst, E. L., Kotok, S., & Hagedorn, A. (2018). Pursuing higher education in rural Pennsylvania schools: Shaping the college path. Rural Educator, 39(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v39i1.211

LeTendre, G., Schooling, P., Woo, H., Bannon, M., & Almes, J. (2023). Distance learning and online coordination of service in Pennsylvania’s rural school districts. Rural Policy-The Research Bulletin of the Center for Rural Pennsylvania, 2(1), 1–1. https://journals.psu.edu/ruralpolicy/article/view/63326

MacSuga-Gage, A. S., Kaplan, R., Batton, B., Ellis, K., & Gage, N. A. (2022). Outcomes in rural and urban settings for students with disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 41(2), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221087678

McCabe, K., & Ruppar, A. L. (2023). Rural inclusive education for students with disabilities in the United States: A narrative review of research. The Rural Educator, 44(1), 40–55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1382555

Mississippi Parent Training and Information Center. (2023). The six main principles of IDEA. http://www.msccd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-Six-Main-Principles-of-IDEA.pdf

Mitchell, C. (2020). A few parents have sued over special education during COVID-19. Will more follow. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/a-few-parents-have-sued-over-special-education-during-covid-19-will-more-follow/2020/07

National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Selected statistics from the public elementary and secondary education universe: School Year 2015-16. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2018/2018052/tables/table_04.asp

Nowicki, J. M. (2019). Special education: IDEA dispute resolution activity in selected states varied based on school districts’ characteristics. Report to congressional requesters. GAO-20-22. US Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-22

Office for Dispute Resolution. (2020). Annual report 2019-2020. https://odr-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/19-20-Annual-Report-Final-9-30-20-Accessible-Version-Updated.pdf

Office for Dispute Resolution. (2021). Annual report 2020-2021. https://odr-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/20-21-Annual-Report-Final-9_16_21_accessible-updated.pdf

Office for Dispute Resolution (2022). Annual report 2021-2022. https://odr-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/ODR_Annual_Report_2021-22.pdf

Office for Dispute Resolution. (2023a). Due process. https://odr-pa.org/due-process/

Office for Dispute Resolution. (2023b). Hearing officer decisions. https://odr-pa.org/due-process/hearing-officer-decisions/

Office for Dispute Resolution (2023c). Annual report 2022-2023. https://odr-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/ODR_Annual_Report_2022-23.pdf

Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2023). IDEA section 618 data collected on children with disabilities served under IDEA in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. https://sites.ed.gov/osers/2023/07/osep-fast-facts-osep-releases-two-new-fast-facts-on-idea-section-618-data-collected-on-children-with-disabilities-served-under-idea-in-the-time-of-the-covid-19-pandemic/#:~:text=There%20was%20an%20overall%20drop%20in%20the%20number%20of%20written,17%20to%20SY%202020%2D21

Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2021). Pennsylvania ARP ESSER State Plan. https://oese.ed.gov/files/2021/08/Pennsylvania-ARP-ESSER-State-Plan-Final.pdf

Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2023). Urban/locale status. https://www.education.pa.gov/DataAndReporting/SchoolLocale/Pages/default.aspx

Pennsylvania School Board Association. (2022). 2022 State of education report. https://www.psba.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2022-State-of-Education-report.pdf

Rush, D. (2022). Due process in a post-Endrew F. society. (Publication No. 29170258) [Doctoral dissertation, Holy Family University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Schafft, K. A., Maselli, A., Kelly, M. G., Dulaney, K., Howd, L. E. P., Gamsom, D. A., Patterson, A. N., Boggs, B., & Frankenberg, E. (2022). Analyzing the effects of COVID-19 on educational equity in rural Pennsylvania school districts. Rural Policy-The Research Bulletin of the Center for Rural Pennsylvania, 1(1), 52–52. https://doi.org/10.3102/1894078

Schanding, G. T., Cheramie, G. M., Hyatt, H., Praytor, S. E., & Yellen, J. R. (2017). Analysis of special education due process hearings in Texas. Sage Open, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017715057

Sharma, R. R. (2019). Evolving a model of sustainable leadership: An ex-post facto research. Vision, 23(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919840216

Showalter, D., Hartman S. L., Johnson, J., & Klein, B. (2019). Why rural matters 2018-2019: The time is now. Rural School and Community Trust.

Skidmore, C. A., & Zirkel, P. A. (2015). Has the Supreme Court’s Schaffer decision placed a burden on hearing officer decision-making under IDEA. Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, 35, 283–304. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj/vol35/iss2/1

Spar, R. K. (2022). FAQ on compensatory education in response to COVID-19. Education Law Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED619398.pdf

Turnage, L. (2020). Out of sight, out of mind: Rural special education and the limitations of IDEA. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 54, 1–54.

United States Census Bureau. (2023). U.S. Census Bureau quick facts about PA. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/PA/PST045222

United States Department of Education. (2021). Return to school roadmap. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/rts-iep-09-30-2021.pdf

United States Department of Education. (2023). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/

Wettach, J. R., & Sanders, B. K. (2020). Insights into due process reform: A nationwide survey of special education attorneys. Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, 20, 239–288. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/4093/

Zablotsky, B., & Black, L. I. (2020). Prevalence of children aged 3-17 years with developmental disabilities, by urbanicity: United States, 2015-2018. National Health Statistics Reports, 139, 1–7. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr139-508.pdf

Zirkel P. A., & Jones N. (2020). Due process hearing and written state complaint activity for COVID-19 issues: A six-month snapshot. CADRE Briefing Paper. https://www.cadreworks.org/resources/cadre-materials-literature-article/due-process-hearing-and-written-state-complaint

Zirkel, P. (2021). Legal decisions for special education COVID-19 issues: Emerging answers. InCASE, 64(4), 1–7. https://perryzirkel.com/2021/03/08/incase-article-covid-19/

Zirkel, P. (2023). 410 Educ. L. Rep. 1 (April 27, 2023). https://perryzirkel.files.wordpress.com/2023/05/covid-19-and-students-with-disabilities-a-snapshot-of-the-legal-activity-to-date.pdf

Zirkel, P., & Vander Ploeg, L. (2019). OSEP May 13, 2019, policy letter to Perry Zirkel. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/files/osep-letter-to-zirkel-05-13-2019.pdf

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Rush, D. (2024). The Influence of COVID-19 in Pennsylvania Rural Schools’ Due Process Hearing Decisions. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 14(1), 30–48. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2024.v14n1p30-48