Teaching with Controversial Texts in Rural School Settings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2023.v13n1p1-31Keywords:
rural education, controversial literature, English language arts, inclusive pedagogyAbstract
The study examines data from surveys and interviews with educators in rural school settings in the Midwest and their use of texts that are deemed controversial with middle and high school students. Qualitative research was conducted with research participants to document how they defined controversial literature, how they used the literature in their school settings, and how they navigated opportunities and challenges for themselves and their students. Extensive quotations from the research participants are used to demonstrate how they define controversial texts, how they use strong pedagogical processes to assist students in learning about specific topics, and important themes about why they continue to teach using controversial literature. In the process of conducting the research, the investigators learned about how voice and choice are used with students for book selection and research topics to assist the teachers in examining topics that can be viewed by those in rural settings as controversial. While acknowledging that some texts could not be used for direct instruction in their setting, each of the research participants believed it was their responsibility to continue using most of the titles of texts cited, assisting students as they researched thought-provoking topics, and discussing the content in order for students to learn the most possible about race, cultures, ethnicities, and other sometimes controversial topics. The educators’ thinking about the research topic and its importance for “growing good humans” is a critical construct stemming from the study.
References
American Library Association (2021). Top 10 most challenged books of 2021. ALA: Office for Intellectual Freedom. https://www.ala.org/advocacy/sites/ala.org.advocacy/files/content/banned/bannedbooksweek/BBW22-top10-fullpage.pdf
Bahl, A., & Garcia, R. (2022, March 6). How can Kansas schools improve Native American education? Start by teaching it, advocates say. The Topeka Capital-Journal.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behaviour, mental processes and consciousness (pp. 17–33). Erlbaum.
Berry, E. (2022, January 7). Talking while black [Radio broadcast]. This American Life. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/758/talking-while-black
Bransford, J., Darling-Hammond, L., & LePage, P. (2005). Introduction. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 1–39). Jossey-Bass.
Camicia, S. P. (2008). Deciding what is a controversial issue: A case study of social studies curriculum controversy. Theory and Research in Social Education, 35(4), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2008.10473378
Coladarci, T. (2007). Improving the yield of rural education research: An editor’s swan song. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22(3), 1–9.
Corbett, J. F. (1950). Current affairs and modern education: A survey of the Nation’s schools. New York Times.
Corbett, M., & Donehower, K. (2017). Rural literacies: Toward social cartography. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 32(5), 1–13.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation (1st ed.). Bergin & Garvey Publishers, Inc.
Gallagher, J. L, Blaisdell, B., Howard, C., & Harris, J. A. (2021). Navigating contentious times in rural education. Theory and Practice in Rural Education, 11(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2021.v11n2p1-14
Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown and Company.
Gregory, M. R. (2014). Directive approach to teaching controversial issues. Educational Theory, 64(6), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12087
Guthrie, J. T., & Knowles, K. T. (2001). Promoting reading motivation. In L. Verhoeven & C. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 159–176). Erlbaum.
Hambacher, E., & Ginn, K. (2021). Race-visible teacher education: A review of the literature from 2002 to 2018. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120948045
Heller, R. (2021). Putting rural communities at the center: A conversation with Sky Marietta. Kappan, 103(4), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217211065824
Hytrek, N. (2021, December 7). Ankeny students stand up for their right to read diverse books. Iowa Starting Line.
Jacobellis v. Ohio. (1964). Oyez. Retrieved from https://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/11.
Johnston, P. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Stenhouse.
Karnopp, J. (2022). Uncovering rural educators’ secret agency. The Rural Educator, 43(2), 34–46.
Kelly-Howard, K. S. (2021). Lessons learned from a review of diverse literature in The Reading Teacher (2015–2020). The Reading Teacher, 75(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2015
Kettler, T., Puryear, J. S., & Mullet, D. R. (2016). Defining rural in gifted education research: Methodological challenges and paths forward. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(4), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16656896
Kuntzman, R. (2018). Contention and conversation in the K-12 classroom. A review essay of teaching controversial issues and the case for contention. Democracy & Education, 26(1), 1–8.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mayor v. Monroe County Community Schools Corporation (2007). https://dk56f7m31ep88.cloudfront.net/ju-AiqXfhelj3jkZ1yR7Lzi_8QQ/brief.pdf
National Center for Educational Statistics (2022). Local definitions. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/annualreports/topical-studies/locale/definitions#:~:text=Territory%20inside%20an%20Urban%20Cluster%20that%20is%20m
Niño, J. M., & Perez-Diaz, M. (2021). Social justice leaders serving students of color in southwest Texas rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 37(7), 80–93. http: //doi.org/10.26209/jrre3707.09
Pajares, F. (2008). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and application (pp. 111–140). Erlbaum.
Rinehart, J. (2016). A quantitative analysis of economic disparities of 2011–2013 rural Missouri public school districts and English I examination scores. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia]. Retrieved from https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10355/59777/research.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
Saavedra, A., Levinson, M., & Polikoff, M. (2022). Survey: Americans broadly support teaching about (most) controversial topics in the classroom. Brown Center Chalkboard. Brookings. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brown-center-chalkboard/2022/10/20/americans-broadly-support-teaching-about-most-controversial-topics-in-the-classroom/
Sari, I. (2019). Examination of the relationship between the tendency of critical thinking and the attitude towards teaching controversial issues. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 4(9), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.27
Strange, M. (2011). Finding fairness for rural students. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 8–15. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/media/ruralfairness-blog.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200603
Swain, A., & Baker, T. L. (2021). Whiteness owns it, blackness defines it: Rural reality in the Black Belt. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 11(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2021.v11n2p15-27
Walsh, M. (2007, October 5). Teacher free speech case denied. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/education/teachers-free-speech-case-denied/2007/10
Walker, A. (2021). Black lives matter to Latinx students: Exploring social practices of Latinx youth as activists in the rural Midwest. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 37(7), 38–56.
Washington, E. Y. & Humphries, E. K. (2011). A social studies teacher’s sense making of controversial issues discussions of race in a predominately white, rural high school classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473448
Wilson, H. E. (2023). Building transformational kindness in schools: A guide for teachers and leaders. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003250739
Zimmerman, J., & Robertson, E. (2017a). The case for contention: Teaching controversial issues in American schools. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226456485.001.0001
Zimmerman, J., & Robertson, E. (2017b). The controversy over controversial issues. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(4), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745541
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dr. Linda Gray Smith, Dr. Victoria N. Seeger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Articles will be published using a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Sharealike license. (For more information on this license, please visit the Creative Commons license page.) Please also note that the authors are explicitly granting permission for Academic Library Services to store a copy of the article in The ScholarShip, ECU's Institutional Repository under the terms of the current ScholarShip license. As a North Carolina agency, ECU contributes copies of all publications to the North Carolina State Archives.
