Building a virtual STEM professional learning network for rural teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2022.v12n2p129-151Keywords:
Rural teacher development, professional development model, science education, STEM education, virtual professional learning communitiesAbstract
This study explored the experiences of rural and suburban teachers as they engaged in virtual and hybrid STEM professional learning opportunities, analyzed through an ethnographic case study. Provided are two lenses through which to view the findings. First, from the rural teachers’ perspective, an exploration of the experiences while engaging in virtual and hybrid STEM professional learning, with findings indicating three major themes: 1) increased collaborations, 2) equitable access to resources and learning and 3) increased content and pedagogical content knowledge. The second perspective, from the project leadership, as collaborations across two IHE’s and with multiple district teachers and administrators, led to the design of a professional development model that was successful at initiating a network for rural teachers to engage in STEM learning through investigations, collaborations within and between districts, and coaching activities, aimed at increasing STEM content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge.
References
Barrett, N., Cowen, J., Toma, E., & Troske, S. (2015). “Working with what they have: Professional development as a reform strategy in rural schools.” Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(10), 1–18. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/30-10.pdf
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, (13)4. 544–559. http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf
Bhattacharya, K. (2007) Introduction to qualitative methods in education: A student handbook.
Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. J. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 6–33. http://www.merga.net.au/ojs/index.php/mted/article/view/44
Colburn, A. (2016). Learning science by doing science: 10 Classic investigations reimagined to teach kids how science really works, grades 3-8. NSTA, Corwin.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
DuFour, R., & Reason, C. (2016). Virtual collaboration: On the tipping point of transformation. Solution Tree Press.
Duncan-Howeel, J. (2010). Teachers making connections: Online communities as a source of professional learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 324–240.
Durr, T., Kampmann, J., Hales, P., & Browning, L. (2020). Lessons learned from online PLCs of rural STEM teachers. Rural Educator, 41(1), 20–26.
Glover, T. A., Nugent, G. C., Chumney, F. L., Ihlo, T., Shapiro, E. S., Guard, K., Koziol, N., & Bovaird, J. (2016). Investigating rural teachers’ professional development, instructional knowledge, and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 31(3), 1–16.
Goodpaster, K., Adedokun, O., & Weaver, G. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teachers retention. Rural Educator, 33(3), 9–22.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Herbert, S., Campbell, C., & Loong, E. (2016). Online professional learning for rural teachers of mathematics and science. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 99¬–114.
Lakin, J., Stambaugh, T., Ihrig, L., Mahatmya, D., & Assouline, S. (2021). Nurturing STEM talent in rural settings. Kappan, 103(4), 24–30.
Lavalley, M. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. Center for Public Education. https://cdn-files.nsba.org/s3fs-public/10901-5071_CPE_Rural_School_Report_Web_FINAL.pdf
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Moore, C. (2018). Creating scientists: Teaching and assessing science practice for the NGSS. Routledge.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, By states. The National Academies Press.
Subotnik, R., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54
Thiele, J., & Bogdon, O. (2020). Renovating science professional development to meet teachers’ needs. The Advocate, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/2637-4552.1135
Vasquez, J., Comer, M., & Villegas, J. (2017). STEM lesson guideposts: Creating STEM lessons for your curriculum. Heinemann.
Yettick, H., Baker, R., Wickersham, M., & Hupfeld, K. (2014). Rural districts left behind? Rural districts and the challenges of administering the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 29(13), 1–15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Julie Thiele , Ollie Bogdon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Articles will be published using a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Sharealike license. (For more information on this license, please visit the Creative Commons license page.) Please also note that the authors are explicitly granting permission for Academic Library Services to store a copy of the article in The ScholarShip, ECU's Institutional Repository under the terms of the current ScholarShip license. As a North Carolina agency, ECU contributes copies of all publications to the North Carolina State Archives.
