Co-designing a rural research practice partnership to design and support STEM pathways for rural youth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2022.v12n2p45-70Keywords:
Rural, STEM Pathway, Research Practice Partnership (RPP), STEM mentoring, co-design, middle-school, programmable sensor technology, 3D printingAbstract
Rural students, schools, and communities have unique challenges that hinder academic achievement, growth, and opportunities, compared to other locales. While there is a need to study this community more, there is also a pressing need to bring the local community members together to support the future generation of learners in developing pathways that lead them to future career opportunities. This article focuses on how a Research Practice Partnership (RPP) can be developed in rural communities to support STEM pathways for local middle-school youth. RPPs are often described as long-term collaborations between both researchers and practitioners in which the participating partners leverage research to address specific persistent problems of practice. We present findings from a developing design-based RPP focused on bringing community members and organizations together to co-design opportunities for underserved youth in rural mountain communities.
References
Allen, P. J., Lewis-Warner, K., & Noam, G. G. (2020). Partnerships to Transform STEM Learning: A Case Study of a STEM Learning Ecosystem. Afterschool Matters, 31, 30-41.
Arnold, M. L., Newman, J. H., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6), 1-25.
Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769
Bartko, W. T. (2005). The ABCs of engagement in out-of-school-time programs. New Directions for Youth Development, 2005(105), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.110
Bekhet, A. K., & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2012). Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data. Nurse researcher. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442
Bell, P., Bricker, L., Reeve, S., Zimmerman, H. T., & Tzou, C. (2013). Discovering and supporting successful learning pathways of youth in and out of school: Accounting for the development of everyday expertise across settings. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Stevens & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST opportunities. Explorations of educational purpose (pp. 119-140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4304-5_9
Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2-3), 153-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963363
Bhaduri, S., Biddy, Q. L., Bush, J., Suresh, A., & Sumner, T. (2021, June). 3DnST: A framework towards understanding children’s interaction with tinkercad and enhancing spatial thinking skills. Interaction Design and Children (pp. 257-267). IDS ’21. June 24-30, 2021, Athens, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3460717
Bhaduri, S., Biddy, L. L., Rummel, M., Bush, J. B., Jacobs, J., Recker, M., Ristvey, J. D., Chakarov, A. G., & Sumner, T. (2021, July). Integrating professional mentorship with a 3D-printing curriculum to help rural youth forge STEM career connections. [Paper presentation] 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. https://peer.asee.org/37363
Bhaduri, S., Van Horne, K., Ristvey, J. D., Russell, R., & Sumner, T. (2018, June). From toys to tools: UAVs in middle-school engineering education (RTP). [Paper presentation] 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1-23). June 23-July 27, 2018. Salt Lake City, Utah. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--30546
Bhaduri, S., Van Horne, K., & Sumner, T. (2019, May). Designing an informal learning curriculum to develop 3D modeling knowledge and improve spatial thinking skills. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-8). CHI 2019, May 4-9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299039
Brenner, D. (2016). Rural education and the Every Student Succeeds Act. The Rural Educator, 37(2), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v37i2.271
Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2014). “What comes to mind when you think of science? The perfumery!”: Documenting science-related cultural learning pathways across contexts and timescales. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 260-285. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21134
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on The Ecology of Human Development (pp. 619–647). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10176-018
Chakarov, A. G., Biddy, Q., Jacobs, J., Recker, M., & Sumner, T. (2020, August). Opening the black box: Investigating student understanding of data displays using programmable sensor technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 291-301). August 1-5, 2020, New Zealand. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406268
Chakarov, A. G., Bush, J., Biddy, Q. L., Jacobs, J., Recker, M., & Sumner, T. (2021, July), Supporting teachers to implement engineering design challenges using sensor technologies in a remote classroom environment. [Paper presentation] 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. July 26-29, 2021. https://peer.asee.org/37789
Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2012). Analyzing educational policies: A learning design perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(4), 487-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.630849
Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. E. (2013, January). Research-practice partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school Districts. William T. Grant Foundation.
Cohen, D. K., & Mehta, J. D. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 644-690. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217700078
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. DBER Speaker Series. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dberspeakers/48
DeYoung, A. J. (1987). The status of American rural education research: An integrated review and commentary. Review of Educational Research, 57(2), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057002123
Dierking, L., Falk, J. H., Shaby, N., & Staus, N. L (2021). Thriving STEM learning ecosystems—for all? Connected Science Learning 3(6). https://www.nsta.org/connected-science-learning/connected-science-learning-november-december-2021/thriving-stem-learning
Falk, J. H., Staus, N., Dierking, L. D., Penuel, W., Wyld, J., & Bailey, D. (2016). Understanding youth STEM interest pathways within a single community: The Synergies project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(4), 369-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1093670
Fisher, A., & Margolis, J. (2003, January). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium On Computer Science Education (p. 23). https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.611896
Fox, M. F., Sonnert, G., & Nikiforova, I. (2009). Successful programs for undergraduate women in science and engineering: Adapting versus adopting the institutional environment. Research in Higher Education, 50(4), 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9120-4
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The importance of interest: The role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x
Henrick, E. C., Cobb, P., Penuel, W. R., Jackson, K., & Clark, T. (2017). Assessing research-practice partnerships: Five dimensions of effectiveness. William T. Grant Foundation.
Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410-1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
Ihrig, L. M., Lane, E., Mahatmya, D., & Assouline, S. G. (2018). STEM excellence and leadership program: Increasing the level of STEM challenge and engagement for high-achieving students in economically disadvantaged rural communities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217745158
Johnson, A., Kuhfeld, M., & Soland, J. (2021). The Forgotten 20%: Achievement and Growth in Rural Schools Across the Nation. Improving Schools, (7) 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480205057704
Leos-Urbel, J. (2015). What works after school? The relationship between after-school program quality, program attendance, and academic outcomes. Youth & Society, 47(5), 684-706.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X13513478
MacPhail, A., Patton, K., Parker, M., & Tannehill, D. (2014). Leading by example: Teacher educators' professional learning through communities of practice. Quest, 66(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2013.826139
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis, 1(1), 1-17.
Noam, G. G., & Tillinger, J. R. (2004). After-school as intermediary space: Theory and typology of partnerships. New Directions for Youth Development, 2004(101), 75-113 https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.73
Penuel, W. R., Farrell, C. C., Anderson, E. R., Coburn, C. E., Allen, A. R., Bohannon, A. X., Hopkins, M., & Brown, S. (2020). A comparative, descriptive study of three research-practice partnerships: Goals, activities, and influence on district policy, practice, and decision making. (Technical Report No. 4). National Center for Research in Policy and Practice.
Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice In Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(01), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206807000300
Roschelle, J., Penuel, W., & Shechtman, N. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics. ISLS Repository. https://doi.dx.org/10.22318/icls2006.606
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Saw, G. K., & Agger, C. A. (2021). STEM pathways of rural and small-town students: Opportunities to learn, aspirations, preparation, and college enrollment. Educational Researcher, 50(9), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211027528
Schafft, K. A., & Jackson, A. Y. (Eds.). (2011). Rural education for the twenty-first century: Identity, place, and community in a globalizing world. Penn State University Press.
Severance, S., Penuel, W. R., Sumner, T., & Leary, H. (2016). Organizing for teacher agency in curricular co-design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 531-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1207541
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
Taylor, K. H., & Hall, R. (2013). Counter-mapping the neighborhood on bicycles: Mobilizing youth to reimagine the city. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 18(1), 65-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9201-5
Tofel-Grehl, C., Searle, K. A., Hawkman, A., MacDonald, B. L., & Suárez, M. I. (2021). Rural Teachers’ Cultural and Epistemic Shifts in STEM Teaching and Learning. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 11(2), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2021.v11n2p45-66
U.S. Census Bureau (2020). United States Census Bureau Quick Facts Eagle County, CO. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/eaglecountycolorado/PST045221
Yurkofsky, M. M., Peterson, A. J., Mehta, J. D., Horwitz-Willis, R., & Frumin, K. M. (2020). Research on continuous improvement: Exploring the complexities of managing educational change. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 403-433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907363
Zwiers, J. (2007). Teacher practices and perspectives for developing academic language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00135.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Srinjita Bhaduri, Quentin Biddy, Colin Hennessy Elliott, Jennifer Jacobs, Melissa Rummel, John Ristvey, Tamara Sumner, Mimi Recker
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Articles will be published using a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Sharealike license. (For more information on this license, please visit the Creative Commons license page.) Please also note that the authors are explicitly granting permission for Academic Library Services to store a copy of the article in The ScholarShip, ECU's Institutional Repository under the terms of the current ScholarShip license. As a North Carolina agency, ECU contributes copies of all publications to the North Carolina State Archives.
