Rural secondary STEM teachers’ understanding of the engineering design process
Impacts of participation in a Research Experiences for Teachers program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2022.v12n2p89-103Keywords:
STEM Education, rural teachers, engineering design process, research experiences for teachers, professional development, qualitative methodsAbstract
Though STEM teacher professional development is known to be beneficial, it is not available equally to educators in all geographic regions. Rural educators face unique challenges not often experienced by their urban and suburban counterparts. This study investigates the impacts of a Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) program on rural math, science, and technology education teachers’ perspectives on how these experiences changed their understanding of the engineering design process (EDP). From 2016 to 2019, eleven rural secondary STEM teachers engaged in a six-week professional development experience focused on research and implementing the EDP. These teachers were rural “solitary” STEM teachers, which meant they were the only teacher of their subject in their school building. This qualitative study used a thematic analysis approach to code and analyze individual and focus group interview transcripts. The results were analyzed to determine how the RET experiences impacted the teachers’ perception of how the EDP is used in problem-solving activities and how it could be integrated into their classroom practices. Results from this study show that the teachers developed a more authentic conceptual understanding of the EDP, which led to increased insightfulness on how to engage students in authentic engineering design activities that strengthen future workforce skills. This study demonstrated that an authentic engineering-based RET program can increase rural teachers’ commitment and readiness to incorporate the EDP into regular classroom practices. Further, this program resulted in teachers gaining a much more nuanced understanding of how the EDP’s non-linear steps and iterative nature contribute to creating authentic problem-solving challenges for students. In particular, the teachers realized the necessity of creating less prescribed challenges that require students to draw upon the constellation of skills necessary to design optimal solutions, resulting in higher-caliber opportunities to develop future workforce skills. These findings emphasize the critical need to design professional development experiences that target the unique needs of rural STEM teachers. Additional research is needed to tease out the extent to which teachers’ increased commitment to using the EPD and a more nuanced understanding of the EDP translate into sustained changes to classroom practice.
References
Anderson J., & Tully D. (2020). Designing and evaluating an integrated STEM professional development program for secondary and primary school teachers in Australia. In J. Anderson & Y. Li (Eds.), Integrated approaches to STEM education. Advances in STEM education (pp. 403-425). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52229-2_22
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392
Barley, Z. A., & Brigham, N. (2008). Preparing teachers to teach in rural schools (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2008–No. 045). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Central. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502145.pdf
Barrett, D. & Usselman, M. (2005, June 12–15). Experience to impact: A comparison of models of university-based summer internships for high school teachers [Paper Presentation]. Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, United States. https://peer.asee.org/15472
Barrett, D. & Usselman, M. (2006, June 18–21). Assessing the long-term impacts of scientific work experience programs for teachers [Paper Presentation]. Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, United States. https://peer.asee.org/321
Barrett, N., Cowen, J., Toma, E., & Troske, S. (2015). Working with what they have: Professional development as a reform strategy in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(10), 1–18.
Basalari, J., de Seriere, A., Hawkins, D., & Miller, D. (2017). Externships transform teaching practice. National Science Teachers Association Reports, 28(7), 3. https://static.nsta.org/pdfs/nstareports/nstareports201703.pdf
Bowen, B. D., & Shume, T. (2018). Educators in industry: An exploratory study to determine how teacher externships influence K-12 classroom practices. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 19(1), 5–10.
Bowen, B. D., & Shume, T. (2020). Developing workforce skills in k-12 classrooms: How teacher externships increase awareness of the critical role of effective communication. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 21(1), 58–65.
Bowen, B. D., Kallmeyer, A., & Erickson, E. (2018, June 24–27). Research Experiences for Teachers in Precision Agriculture and Sustainability for Solitary STEM Educators. Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, United States.
Bowen, B. D., Kallmeyer, A., & Erickson, E. (2019, June 16–19). The Impact of a Research Experiences for Teachers Program in Precision Agriculture and Sustainability for Rural STEM Educators. Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, United States.
Bowen, B. D., Shume, T., Kallmeyer, A., & Altimus, J. (2021). Impacts of a Research Experiences for Teachers Program on Rural STEM Educators. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 22(4), 58–64.
Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cejka, E., & Rogers, C. (2005, June 12-15). Inservice teachers and the engineering design process. Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, United States. https://peer.asee.org/inservice-teachers-and-the-engineering-design-process
Darling-Hammond, L., & Baratz-Snowden, J. (2005). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve. Jossey-Bass.
Dee, T. S., & Goldhaber, D. (2017). Understanding and addressing teacher shortages in the United States. (Policy Proposal 2017-05). The Hamilton Project. https://www.hamiltonproject.org/assets/files/understanding_and_addressing_teacher_shortages_in_us_pp.pdf
DeJong, B., Yelamarthi, K., & Kaya, T., (2016). An engineering research program for high school science teachers: Year two changes and results. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17(1), 15–21.
Du, W., Liu, D., Johnson, C. C., Sondergeld, T. A., Bolshakova, V. L., & Moore, T. J. (2019). The impact of integrated STEM professional development on teacher quality. School Science and Mathematics, 119(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12318
Farrell, A. M. (1992). What teachers can learn from industry internships. Educational Leadership, 49(6), 38–39.
Ficklin, K., Parker, M., & Shaw-Ferguson, T. (2020). Qualitative research on the influence of engineering professional development on teacher self-efficacy in a rural K-5 setting. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(4), 687–703.
Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). Teacher Development and Educational Change. Falmer Press.
Garrett, T. (2008). Student-centered and teacher-centered classroom management: A case study of three elementary teachers. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 43(1), 34–47.
Glover, T. A., Nugent, G. C., Chumney, F. L., Ihlo, T., Shapiro, E. S., Guard, K., Kozial, N., & Bovaird, J. (2016). Investigating rural teachers’ professional development, instructional knowledge, and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 31(3), 1–16.
Goodpaster, K. P., Adedokun, O. A., & Weaver, G. C. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention. The Rural Educator, 33(3), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.408
Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Guskey, T., & Huberman, M. (1995). Professional development in education. Teachers College Press.
Guzey, S. S., Tank, K., Wang, H., Rochrig, G., & Moore, T. (2014). A high-quality professional development for teachers of grades 3-6 for implementing engineering into classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12061
Hammock, R., & Ivey, T. (2017). Examining elementary teachers' engineering self-efficacy and engineering teacher efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1-2), 52–62.
Hart, S. M. (2018). Rural science teachers’ intentions of integrating STEM career-related lessons. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Walden University.
Kantrov, I. (2014). Externships and beyond: Work-based learning for teachers as a promising strategy for increasing the relevance of secondary education. Education Development Center, Inc.
Krahenbuhl, K. S. (2016). Student-centered education and constructivism: Challenges, concerns, and clarity for teachers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 89(3), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1191311
Landis, A. E., Schunn, C. D., Rothermel, M. C., Shrake, S., & Niblick, B. (2011, June 26-29). Development of a high school engineering research program: Findings from a research experience for teachers (RET) site. Annual Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Canada.
Lavalley, M. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation. National School Boards Association, Center for Public Education.
Lottero-Perdue, P., & Parry, E. A. (2017). Elementary teachers' reflections on design failures and use of fail words after teaching engineering for two years. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1160
Loughran, J. J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102053001004
National Science and Technology Council. (2018). Charting a course for success: America's strategy for STEM education. Committee on STEM Education. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED590474
P21 (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. Partnership for 21st century learning a network of Battelle for kids. Retrieved from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf
Parker, C., Abel, Y., & Denisova, E. (2015). Urban elementary STEM initiative. School Science and Mathematics, 115(6), 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12133
Parker, M., Ficklin, K., & Mishra, M. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy in a rural K-5 setting: Quantitative research on the influence of engineering professional development. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(4), 704–729.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Pinnell, M., Rowley, J., Preiss, S., Blust, R. P., Beach, R., & Franco, S. (2013). Bridging the gap between engineering design and PK-12 curriculum development through the use the STEM education quality framework. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(4), 28–35.
Player, D. (2015). The supply and demand for rural teachers. Rural Opportunities Consortium of Idaho.
Reynolds, D., Yazdani, N., & Manzur, T. (2013). STEM high school teaching enhancement through collaborative engineering research on extreme winds. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(1), 12–19.
Showalter, D., Hartman, S. L., Johnson, J. D., & Klein, R. M. (2019). Why rural matters 2018–2019: The time is now. Rural School and Community Trust, College Board, and the Schools Superintendents Association.
Silverstein, S., Dubner, J., Frechtling, J., Busch-Johnsen, T., Hutchison, N., Ohme, P., Storm, K., Garet, M., Herrelko, D., Hoye, J. D., Miller, J., Richards, J., Schulz, B., Singer, M., Weiss, I., Young, J., Winter, J., Von Secker, C., Zounar, E., . . .& Shettle, C. (2002). The effects of teacher participation in a scientific work experience program on student attitudes and achievement: A collaborative multi-site study. http://scienceteacherprogram.org/SWEPTStudy/
Silverstein, S., Dubner, J., Miller, J., Glied, S. & Loike, J. (2009). Teachers’ participation in research programs improves their students’ achievement in science. Science, 326(5951), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177344
Stewart, C. (2014). Transforming professional development to professional learning. Journal of Adult Education, 43(1), 28–33.
Sunyoung, H., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers' implementation and understanding of STEM project-based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
Webb, D. L. (2015). Engineering professional development: Elementary teachers’ self-efficacy and sources of self-efficacy. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Portland State University.
Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. National Staff Development Council.
Williams, D. T. (2010). The rural solution: How community schools can reinvigorate rural education. Rural School and Community Trust. https://www.ruraledu.org/user_uploads/file/The_Rural_Solution.pdf
Yelamarthi, K., Kaya, T., DeJong, B., Chen, D., Hu, Q., & Cheng, F. (2013). An engineering research program for high school science teachers: Feedback and lessons learned from the pilot implementation. Technology Interface International Journal, 13(2), 49–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Teresa Shume, Bradley Bowen, Jewel Altimus, Alan Kallmeyer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Articles will be published using a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Sharealike license. (For more information on this license, please visit the Creative Commons license page.) Please also note that the authors are explicitly granting permission for Academic Library Services to store a copy of the article in The ScholarShip, ECU's Institutional Repository under the terms of the current ScholarShip license. As a North Carolina agency, ECU contributes copies of all publications to the North Carolina State Archives.
