The Second Most Important Decision

Protocol for Partnering for Intern Placement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2022.v12n1p3-24

Keywords:

principal preparation, internship, mentor principal, partnership, intern placement

Abstract

For principal preparation program success, the selection of an aspiring school administrator’s internship placement/mentor principal is second in importance only to the decision about whom to select into the program. In this article, we review the scant literature on internship placement assignment processes, none of which are specific to rural places. We then describe the Principal Preparation for Excellence and Equity in Rural Schools (PPEERS) program – a partnership of 12 rural districts and a large public university – and explain the process by which the partnership co-designed their internship placement protocol and Assignment of Internship Placements tool. We then introduce the protocol, which involves program leaders traveling to each rural partner district across a wide geographic area to meet with the superintendent and District Point Person – the cabinet-level administrator who is the lead district liaison for PPEERS – to consensually select a mentor principal/internship site for each Intern, using the internship tool, which identifies factors to select for and to avoid. After describing the protocol and introducing the tool, we outline our action research methods. Utilizing a two-phase reflective inquiry process, we drew on perceptions of leadership coaches, district partners, and program leaders to reflect on contextual considerations, the impact of the tool, and ways to improve our placement practice. Contextual considerations reflect realities of rural districts, including limited placement choices in small districts, limited number of principals who fit the mentor principal criteria, and micropolitical considerations. Improvements to our process include considering the entire leadership team of a school when selecting placements; including additions to the tool regarding consideration of equity, diversity, and inclusion, as well as addition of a “Goldilocks school” element; and ideas for increasing mentor principal readiness and intern knowledge of curriculum and pedagogy when placed in a school level that is unfamiliar to them. In these ways the partnership can leverage rural partner assets and address contextual challenges. We conclude with implications for rural school leader preparation programs.

 

Author Biographies

Kimberly Kappler Hewitt, University of North Carolina Greensboro

Kimberly Kappler Hewlett, PhD, serves as an associate professor of educational leadership in the Division of Research, Discovery, and Innovation at the University of North Carolina Greensboro. She is the principal investigator and director of the Principal Preparation for Excellence and Equity in Rural Schools (PPEERS) program, which was awarded the 2021 Exemplary Educational Leadership Program award from the University Council of Educational Administration. She teaches instructional leadership, methods, and culturally responsive leadership courses. Her research centers on leadership preparation, research practice partnerships, rural education, and equity and social justice. Prior to her work at the University of North Carolina Greensboro, Hewitt held the roles of teacher, principal, District Instructional Specialist, and Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment. She can be reached at kkhewitt@uncg.edu  .

Mark A. Rumley, University of North Carolina Greensboro

Mark A. Rumley, EdD, serves as a faculty member for and the Assistant Director of the Principal Preparation for Excellence and Equity in Rural Schools (PPEERS), an innovative and nationally recognized school leadership preparation program within the School of Education at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. He has been a lifetime educator, having served for nearly 40 years in the roles of teacher, assistant principal, principal, assistant superintendent, assistant professor, and a state-based educational director for superintendents and boards of education through the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. He continues to serve as an executive coach and presenter for school districts regarding leadership for rural schools, beginning teacher support and retention efforts, equity-based education, and leadership development through cognitive coaching. He is also a co-owner of and the secretary for Equity B.A.N.C., Inc. (www.equitybanc.org).  

References

Adams, M. R. (2013). Growing as a leader through developing others: The effect of being a mentor principal [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Nebraska.

Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2016). Blind spot: Hidden biases of good people. Bantam.

Billings, D. (2016). Deep denial: The persistence of white supremacy in United States history and life. Crandall, Dostie & Douglass Books.

Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Allen, L. W. (2006). Preparing principals for high-need rural schools: A central office perspective about collaborative efforts to transform school leadership. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(1), 1–16.

Campbell, J. T., & Parker, R. (2016). A comparison of internships among Louisiana University principal preparation programs. Research in the Schools, 23(2), 17¬–27.

Convery, I., Corsane, G., & Davis, P. (Eds.). (2012). Making sense of place: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Boydell Press.

Crawford, J., Wasonga, T. A., & Howell, C. (2011, Fall). Elbow learning: A redesigned school district leaders’ internship. UCEA Review, 25–27.

Cruzeiro, P. A., & Boone, M. (2009). Rural and small school principal candidate: Perspectives of hiring superintendents. The Rural Educator, 31(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v31i1.437

Curtin, L., & Cohn, T. (2015, January). Overview of rural communities: Context, challenges, and resilience. Psychology and AIDS Newsletter. https://www.apa.org/pi/aids/resources/exchange/2015/01/rural-communities

Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2020). Action research in education: A practical guide. Guilford Press.

Fusarelli, B. C., Fusarelli, L. D., & Wirt, L. G. (2018). Developing and sustaining school-university-community collaborative partnerships to develop school leaders in rural areas. In R. M. Reardon & J. Leonard (Eds.), Innovation and implementation in rural places: School–university–community collaboration in education (pp. 3–28). Information Age.

Geer, G. C., Anast-May, L., & Gurley, D. K. (2014). Interns’ perceptions of administrative internships: Do principals provide internship activities in areas they deem important? International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 9(1), 1–5.

Geismar, T. J., Morris, J. D., & Lieberman, M. G. (2000). Selecting mentors for principalship interns. Journal of School Leadership, 10(May), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460001000302

Hewitt, K. K., & Rumley, M. A. (2020). Specialized educational leadership for rural students living in poverty. In B. S. Zugelder, C. Greene, & J. Manner (Eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and advocacy for children and families in rural poverty (pp. 425–251). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2787-0.ch020

Irving, D. (2014). Waking up white and finding myself in the story of race. Elephant Room Press.

Jackson, R. R. (2013). Never underestimate your teachers: Instructional leadership for excellence in EVERY classroom. ASCD.

Johnson, J., & Reynolds, S. (2011). Innovative teaching and learning strategies for leadership in context: A rural example. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(3), 1–10.

Klocko, B. A., & Justis, R. J. (2019). Leadership challenges of the rural school principal. The Rural Educator, 40(3), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v40i3.571

Lavalley, M. (2018). Out of the loop: Rural schools are largely left out of research and policy discussions, exacerbating poverty, inequity, and isolation (Center for Public Education). National School Boards Association. https://education.wsu.edu/documents/2018/12/center-public-education-rural-schools-report.pdf/

Lochmiller, C. R., Sugimoto, T. J., & Muller, P. A. (2016). Teacher retention, mobility, and attrition in Kentucky public schools from 2008 to 2012 (REL 2016–116). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Malcus, N. (2018). A statistic portrait of rural education in America. In M. Q. McShane & A. Smarick (Eds.), No longer forgotten: The triumphs and struggles of rural education in America (pp. 9–28). Rowman & Littlefield.

McShane, M. Q., & Smarick, A. (2018). Introduction. In M. Q. McShane & A. Smarick (Eds.), No longer forgotten: The triumphs and struggles of rural education in America (pp. 1–8). Rowman & Littlefield.

Mills, G. E. (2011). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Pearson.

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). NCES locale classifications and criteria. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/docs/locale_classifications.pdf

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2006, 2009, rev. 2013). North Carolina standards for school executives. Author. https://www.dpi.nc.gov/media/507/download

Orr, M. T., & Orphanos, S. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals. Educational Administration Quarterly 47(1), 18–70. http://doi.10.1177/0011000010378610

Pijanowski, J. C., Hewitt, P. M., & Brady, K. P. (2009). Superintendents’ perceptions of the principal shortage. NASSP Bulletin, 93(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636509343963

Preston, J. P., & Barnes, K. E. R. (2017). Successful leadership in rural schools: Cultivating collaboration. The Rural Educator, 38(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v38i1.231

Redding, S., & Walberg, H. (2012). Promoting learning in rural schools (Center on Innovation and Improvement). Academic Development Institute.

Reyes-Guerra, D., & Barnett, B. D. (2017). Clinical practice in educational leadership. In M. D. Young & G. M. Chow (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders, (pp. 229–261). Routledge/UCEA.

Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. ASCD.

Schechter, C. (2014). Mentoring prospective principals: Determinants of productive mentor-mentee relationship. International Journal of Educational Reform, 23(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791402300103

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Smith, T. L., Barlow, P. B., Skolits, G. J., & Peters, J. M. (2015). Demystifying reflective practice: Using the DATA model to enhance evaluators’ professional activities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 52(2015), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.04.004

Smith, T. L., & Skolits, G. J. (2021). Conceptualizing and engaging in reflective practice: Experienced evaluators’ perspectives. American Journal of Evaluation, 43(1), 5–25.

Swaminathan, R., & Reed, L. (2020). Mentor perspectives on mentoring new principals. Journal of School Leadership, 30(3) 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684619884785

Thessin, R. A., Clayton, J. K., & Jamison, K. (2020). Profiles of the administrative internship: The mentor/intern partnership in facilitating leadership experiences. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 15(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775118770778

Tieken, M. C. (2014). Why rural schools matter. UNC Press. https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469618487.001.0001

van Someran, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method. Academic Press. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.821.4127&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Versland, T. M. (2013). Principal efficacy: Implications for rural ‘grow your own’ leadership programs. The Rural Educator, 35(1), 1–10.

Whitaker, K. S., King, R., & Vogel, L. R. (2004). School district-university partnerships: Graduate student perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of a reformed leadership development program. Planning and Changing, 35(3&4), 209¬–222. (EJ737638) ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ737638.pdf

Wieczorek, D., & Manard, C. (2018). Instructional leadership challenges and practices of novice principals in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 34(2), 1–21.

Wilmore, E. L. & Bratlien, M. J. (2005). Mentoring and tutoring within administrative internship programs in American universities. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 13(1), 23–37. https://doi:10.1080/13611260500040047

Wood, J. N., Finch, K., & Mirecki, R. M. (2013). If we get you, how can we keep you? Problems with recruiting and retaining rural administrators. The Rural Educator, 34(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v34i2.399

Woodrum, A., Borden, A. M., Bower, D., Olguin, S., & Paul, L. (2014). Raising the quality of principal leadership development: Lessons from a collaboration between an urban school district, a state leadership institute, and a university leadership program. In K. L. Sanzo (Ed.), From policy to practice: Sustainable innovations in school leadership preparation and development, (pp. 47–70). Information Age.

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Hewitt, K. K., & Rumley, M. A. (2022). The Second Most Important Decision: Protocol for Partnering for Intern Placement. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 12(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2022.v12n1p3-24