Rural Schools and the Digital Divide
Technology in the Learning Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2021.v11n1p25-39Keywords:
rural schools, educational technology, digital divide, barriers to useAbstract
In this era of rapid technological innovation, teachers in rural public schools employ a variety of educational technology tools to facilitate student learning. However, little information is known about these teachers’ usage frequencies and perceptions of effectiveness of technology in the learning process. Furthermore, limited research exists related to the barriers rural teachers face in their adoption and use of technology. Utilizing a quantitative approach, this study investigated these perceptions among rural teachers. Findings revealed rural educators have differing opinions on usage and effectiveness of various web-based technologies and software. Teachers revealed personal trial and error as the most common way of new technology knowledge and skill acquisition. Participants reported budgetary issues as the largest barrier to technology implementation, followed by student internet access at home. Suggestions are provided so administrators and teachers can adopt and integrate appropriate educational technology tools to maximize student learning.
References
Alt, D. (2018). Science teachers' conceptions of teaching and learning, ICT efficacy, ICT professional development and ICT practices enacted in their classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.020
American Civil Liberties Union West Virginia. (2020). Digital divide: WV officials must address inequality in education. Retrieved from: https://www.acluwv.org/en/news/digital-divide-wv-officials-must-address-inequality-education
Blanchard, M. R., LePrevost, C. E., Tolin, A. D., & Gutierrez, K. S. (2016). Investigating technology-enhanced teacher professional development in rural, high-poverty middle schools. Educational Researcher, 45(3), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16644602
Blau, I., & Hameiri, M. (2017). Ubiquitous mobile educational data management by teachers, students and parents: Does technology change school-family communication and parental involvement? Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1231-1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9487-8
Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Relationship of middle school student STEM interest to career intent. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 3(1), 1-13. httpshttps://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275649
Chung, W.C. (2011). ICT integration in a “FutureSchool" in Singapore. In C. Ho & M. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (pp. 1118–1127). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Coley, M. D., Warner, W. J., Stair, K. S., Flowers, J. L., & Croom, D. B. (2015). Technology usage of Tennessee agriculture teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(3), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.03035
Croft, M., & Moore, R. (2019). Rural students: Technology, coursework, and extracurricular activities. ACT Center for Equity in Learning.
Davis, M., & Hall, C. (2018, June). Technology integration professional development for rural educators. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 1808-1817). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Domingo, M. G., & Garganté, A. B. (2016). Exploring the use of educational technology in primary education: Teachers' perception of mobile technology learning impacts and applications' use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.023
Edwards, S. (2016). New concepts of play and the problem of technology, digital media and popular-culture integration with play-based learning in early childhood education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 513-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1108929
Eppley, K. (2017). Rural science education as social justice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-016-9751-7
Fowler Jr., F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. (5th ed.). Sage.
Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2015). Uneven playing field? Assessing the teacher quality gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15592622
Goldman, S., & Kabayadondo, Z. (2016). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. In S. Goldman & Z. Kabayadondo (Eds.), Taking design thinking to school (pp. 21-37). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781317327585
Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in US public schools: 2009 (NCES Report 2010-040). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/ 2010040.pdf
Handal, B., Watson, K., Petocz, P., & Maher, M. (2018). Choosing to teach in rural and remote schools: The zone of free movement. Education Research and Perspectives, 45, 1-32.
Harris, R. S., & Hodges, C. B. (2018). STEM education in rural schools: Implications of untapped potential. National Youth-At-Risk Journal, 3(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.20429/nyarj.2018.030102
Heath, M. K. (2017). Teacher-initiated one-to-one technology initiatives: How teacher self-efficacy and beliefs help overcome barrier thresholds to implementation. Computers in the Schools, 34(1-2), 88-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2017.1305879
Holder, K.A., Fields, A., & Lofquist, D. (2016). Rurality matters. Census Blogs. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2016/12/rurality_matters.html
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2014). ISTE standards: Teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20- 14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf
Islim, O. F., Ozudogru, G., & Sevim-Cirak, N. (2018). The use of digital storytelling in elementary math teachers’ education. Educational Media International, 55(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1484045
Jones, M., & Dexter, S. (2018). Teacher perspectives on technology integration professional development: Formal, informal, and independent learning activities. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 27(1), 83-102.
Kalonde, G. (2017). Technology use in rural schools: A study of a rural high school trying to use iPads in the classroom. Rural Educator, 38(3), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v38i3.218
Khlaif, Z. N. (2018). Factors influencing teachers’ attitudes toward mobile technology integration in K-12. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(1), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9311-6
Knoblauch, D., & Chase, M. A. (2015). Rural, suburban, and urban schools: The impact of school setting on the efficacy beliefs and attributions of student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.001
Kormos, E. M. (2018). The unseen digital divide: Urban, suburban, and rural teacher use and perceptions of web-based classroom technologies. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1429168
Kotrlik, J. W., & Redmann, D. H. (2009). Analysis of teachers’ adoption of technology for use in instruction in seven career and technical education programs. Career and Technical Education Research, 34(1), 47-77. https://doi.org/10.5328/CTER34.1.47
Makki, T. W., O'Neal, L. J., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2018). When first-order barriers are high: A comparison of second-and third-order barriers to classroom computing integration. Computers & Education, 120, 90-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.005
Marshall, J. (2016). Quality teaching: Seven apps that will change the way you teach in the English Language Arts classroom. Voices from the Middle, 23(4), 66-73.
McCulloch, A. W., Hollebrands, K., Lee, H., Harrison, T., & Mutlu, A. (2018). Factors that influence secondary mathematics teachers' integration of technology in mathematics lessons. Computers & Education, 123(4), 26-40. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008
Miller, M. (2010). An investigation of perceived anxiety toward new software technologies among teachers in a Mississippi rural school district Publication No. 3398540). [Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/33/98/3398540.html
National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). “Urban/Rural” classification of schools and local education agencies. Retrieved from: http://www.papartnerships.org/pdfs/methodology.pdf
Pazilah, F. N.., Hashim, H., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Using technology in ESL classroom: Highlights and challenges. Creative Education, 10(12), 3205-3212. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012244
Prasojo, L. D., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Hendra, R., & Iqroni, D. (2019). Building quality education through integrating ICT in schools: Teachers' attitudes, perception, and barriers. Quality-Access to Success, 20(172), 45-50.
Redding, S., & Walberg, H. J. (2012). Promoting learning in rural schools. Center on Innovation & Improvement. ERIC (ED573693).
Ryan, T., & Bagley, G. (2015). Nurturing the integration of technology in education. Journal of Theory & Practice in Education (JTPE), 11(1), 33-50.
Schafft, K. A. (2016). Rural education as rural development: Understanding the rural school–community well-being linkage in a 21st-century policy context. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1151734
Tamin, R., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P., & Schmid, R. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
Tran, H., Smith, D. A., & Fox, E. C. (2018). Perspectives of potential and current teachers for rural teacher recruitment and retention. Center for Innovation in Higher Education. https://www.usccihe.org/s/SC-Teacher-Perspectives-on-RRI-Final-Draft-rev2.pdf
Tustin, N. (2014). The role of patient satisfaction in online health information seeking. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730903465491
United States Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010.pdf
Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E. H., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Connecting rural schools to quality education: Rural teachers’ use of digital educational resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.009
Weiss, E. (2019). Tailoring integrated student supports to rural contexts. Phi Delta Kappan, 101(2), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721719879155
Weiss, E., & Ellerson, N. (2014). Rich Hill: The gap between student needs and school capacity. AASA and the Economic Policy Institute.
Weiss, E., & Reville, P. (2019). Broader, bolder, better: How schools and communities help students overcome the disadvantages of poverty. Harvard Education Press.
Yang, S., & Kwok, D. (2017). A study of students’ attitudes towards using ICT in a social constructivist environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 50-62.
Yentes, J. & Gaskill, M. (2015). Technology use in tural and urban schools: Challenges and opportunities in the Midwest. In D. Slykhuis & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 1415-1423). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274708830
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Erik Kormos, Kendra Wisdom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Articles will be published using a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Sharealike license. (For more information on this license, please visit the Creative Commons license page.) Please also note that the authors are explicitly granting permission for Academic Library Services to store a copy of the article in The ScholarShip, ECU's Institutional Repository under the terms of the current ScholarShip license. As a North Carolina agency, ECU contributes copies of all publications to the North Carolina State Archives.
