Exploring Gifted Education Program and Practice in Rural Appalachia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2020.v10n2p101-118Keywords:
gifted education, place, curriculum, rural education, AppalachiaAbstract
The literature on rural gifted programs is growing, but understandings of programmatic features and the teachers within the gifted programs in rural Appalachia are still largely underdeveloped. Through an exploratory case study of three rural Appalachian gifted programs, this study provides a glimpse into their organizational structures and the teachers’ experiences and perceptions. The illustrative findings indicate that teachers utilized their resources and knowledge to manufacture their gifted curricula and expressed competing narratives of place and globality. Also, misassumptions and unsupported practices in this rural place negatively influenced teacher retention. Implications and future steps are addressed.
References
Azano, A. (2011). The possibility of place: One teacher’s use of place-based instruction for English students in a rural high school. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(10), 1–12.
Azano, A. P., Callahan, C. M., Brodersen, A. V., & Caughey, M. (2017). Responding to the challenges of gifted education in rural communities. Global Education Review, 4(1), 62–77. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137998.pdf
Azano, A. P., Callahan, C. M., Missett, T. C., & Brunner, M. (2014). Understanding the experiences of gifted education teachers and fidelity of implementation in rural schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(2), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14524405
Azano, A. P., & Stewart, T. T. (2015). Exploring place and practicing justice: Preparing pre-service teachers for success in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(9), 1–12.
Azano, A. P., & Stewart, T. T. (2016). Confronting challenges at the intersection of rurality, place, and teacher preparation: Improving efforts in teacher education to staff rural schools. Global Education Review, 3(1), 108–128. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1090174.pdf
Bain, S. K., Bourgeois, S. J., & Pappas, D. N. (2003). Linking theoretical models to actual practices: A survey of teachers in gifted education. Roeper Review, 25(4), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554224
Bass, E. L. (2019). Examining a place-based curriculum for high-performing learners: A place-based, critical, dialogic curriculum for high-performing rural writers [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech].
Baum, S. (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(1), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200108
Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hébert, T. P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(4), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900406
Borland, J. H. (2012). Problematizing gifted education. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 93–104). Routledge.
Brigandi, C. B., Siegle, D., Weiner, J. M., Gubbins, E. J., & Little, C. A. (2016). Gifted secondary school students: The perceived relationship between enrichment and goal valuation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(4), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216671837
Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1069
Brown, E., Avery, L., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B. B., & Stambaugh, T. (2006). A five-state analysis of gifted education policies. Roeper Review, 29(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190609554379
Burns, D. E. (1990). The effects of group training activities on students’ initiation of creative investigations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400107
Burton, M., Brown, K., & Johnson, A. (2013). Storylines about rural teachers in the United States: A narrative analysis of the literature. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 28(12), 1–18. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a405/3c2e44babda96c82eeb9536803d20d979b10.pdf
Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Oh, S. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215
Carr, P. J., & Kefalas, M. J. (2009). Hollowing out the middle: The rural brain drain and what it means for America. Beacon Press.
Carver-Thomas, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher turnover: Why it matters and what we can do about it. Learning Policy Institute.
Corbett, M. (2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Fernwood Publishing.
Croft, L. (2015) Rural teachers of the gifted: The importance of professional development. In T. Stambaugh & S. M. Woods (Eds.), Serving gifted students in rural settings (pp. 341–362). Prufrock Press.
Davidson Institute. (n.d.). Support for gifted programs vary greatly from state to state. Author. https://www.davidsongifted.org/search-database/entrytype/3
Dixon, F. A., Yssel, N., McConnell, J. M., & Hardin, T. (2014). Differentiated instruction, professional development, and teacher efficacy. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214529042
Educational Testing Service. (2019). The Praxis(R) study companion: Gifted Education 5358. https://www.ets.org/s/praxis/pdf/5358.pdf
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
Floyd, E. F., McGinnis, J. L., & Grantham, T. C. (2011). Gifted education in rural environments. In J. A. Castellano & A. D. Frazier (Eds.), Special populations in gifted education (pp. 27–46). Prufrock Press.
Gallagher, J. L., Swalwell, K. M., & Bellows, M. E. (2019). “Pinning” with pause: Supporting teachers’ critical consumption on sites of curriculum sharing. Social Education, 83(4), 217–224. https://www.socialstudies.org/publications/socialeducation/september2019
Gimbert, B. G., & Chesley, D. (2009). Predicting teacher success using teacher selection practices and classroom performance assessment. Journal of School Leadership, 19(1), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460901900104
Gore, J. S., Wilburn, K. R., Treadway, J., & Plaut, V. (2011). Regional collectivism in Appalachia and academic attitudes. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(4), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397111403396
Green, B., & Corbett, M. (2013). Rural education and literacies: An introduction. In B. Green & M. Corbett (Eds.), Rethinking rural literacies: Transnational perspectives (pp. 1–13). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275493
Greenwood, D. (2011). Why place matters: Environment, culture, and education. In S. Tozer, B. Gallegos, A. Henry, M. B. Greiner, & P. Groves-Price (Eds.), Handbook of research in the social foundations of education (pp. 632–640). Routledge.
Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003
Hammer, P. C., Hughes, G., McClure, C., Reeves, C., & Salgado, D. (2005). Rural teacher recruitment and retention practices: A review of the research literature, national survey of rural superintendents, and case studies of programs in Virginia. Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Edvantia. (ED489143). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489143.pdf
Howley, A., & Howley, C. B. (2005). High-quality teaching: Providing for rural teachers’ professional development. Rural Educator, 26(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v26i2.509
Howley, C., Harmon, H., & Leopold, G. (1997). Rural scholars or bright rednecks? Aspirations for a sense of place among rural youth in Appalachia. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12(3), 150–160. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/12-3_5.pdf
Howley, A., Rhodes, M., & Beall, J. (2009). Challenges facing rural schools: Implications for gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903200404
Hudson, P., & Hudson, S. (2008). Changing preservice teachers’ attitudes for teaching in rural schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(4) 67–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2008v33n4.6
Jones, L. (1994). Appalachian values. Jesse Stuart Foundation.
Kettler, T., Russell, J., & Puryear, J. S. (2015). Inequitable access to gifted education: Variance in funding and staffing based on locale and contextual school variables. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215578277
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 741–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019237
Kuehl, R. E. (2020). Fourth-grade narrative fiction writing: Using content analysis to examine the intersection of place, high ability, and creativity [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Tech].
Lewis, J. D. (2015). Programming and rural gifted learners: A review of models and applications. In T. Stambaugh & S. M. Woods (Eds.), Serving gifted students in rural settings (pp. 179–218). Prufrock Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Matthews, M. S., & Shaunessy, E. (2010). Putting standards into practice: Evaluating the utility of the NAGC pre-K–grade 12 gifted program standards. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(3), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209356708
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation [eBook edition]. Wiley. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Miller, M. M. (2019). Using the Enrichment Triad Model to explore place and support curriculum in one rural gifted program (Publication No. 7375). [Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University]. Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7375
Monk, D. H. (2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. Future of Children, 1(17), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2007.0009
National Association for Gifted Children. (2019a). A definition of giftedness that guides best practice: A position statement. Author. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Position Statement/Definition of Giftedness (2019).pdf
National Association for Gifted Children. (2019b). Standard 1.2.1: Learning and development. In Pre-K–grade 12 gifted programming standards. Author. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/Programming%20Standard%201%20Learning%20&%20Development.pdf
National Association for Gifted Children. (n.d.-a). Glossary of terms. Author. https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/glossary-terms
National Association for Gifted Children. (n.d.-b). The importance of teachers. Author. https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/gifted-education-practices/importance-teachers
National Association for Gifted Children & Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. (2015). 2014–2015 State of the states in gifted education: Policy and practice data. Author. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/key reports/2014-2015 State of the States (final).pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Rural education in America: Definitions. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/definitions.asp
National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). Digest of education statistics. Author. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_049.asp
National Association of Counties. (2017). County explorer. Author. https://ce.naco.org/?county_info=54057
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Paul, K. A., & Seward, K. K. (2016). Place-based investment model of talent development: A proposed model for developing and reinvesting talents within the community. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(4), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16669546
Pendarvis, E., & Wood, E. W. (2009). Eligibility of historically underrepresented students referred for gifted education in a rural school district: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903200403
Peterson, J. S., & Margolin, L. (1997). Naming gifted children: An example of unintended “reproduction.” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329702100105
Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., Stumpf, E., Motschenbacher, M., Vogl, K., Scherrer, V., & Schneider, W. (2019). High‐ability grouping: Benefits for gifted students’ achievement development without costs in academic self‐concept. Child Development, 90(4), 1185–1201. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12996
Rasheed, M. (2020). Context and content in rural gifted education: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X19879174
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Creative Learning Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627702100216
Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200821
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for talent development (3rd ed.). Prufrock Press.
Richards, Z. J., & Stambaugh, T. (2015). National context of rural schools. In T. Stambaugh & S. M. Woods (Eds.), Serving gifted students in rural settings (pp. 1–21). Prufrock Press.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261–288. https://doi.org 10.1037/0033–2909.130.2.261
Ross, J. A., Cousins, J. B., Gadalla, T., & Hannay, L. (1999). Administrative assignment of teachers in restructuring secondary schools: The effect of out-of-field course responsibility on teacher efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 782–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131619921968824
Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research (3rd ed.) [eBook edition]. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Fraser-Seeto, K., Howard, S. J., & Woodcock, S. (2015). An investigation of teachers’ awareness and willingness to engage with a self-directed professional development package on gifted and talented education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n1.1
Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Siegle, D., Puryear, J. S., Estepar-Garcia, W., Callahan, C. M., Gubbins, E. J., McCoach, D. B., Mun, R. U., & Amspaugh, C. M. (2017, April). Gifted education structures in elementary schools and their connections to program focus. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.
Spotlight on Poverty and Opportunity. (2020). West Virginia data. Author. https://spotlightonpoverty.org/states/west-virginia/
Stambaugh, T., & Woods, S. M. (2015). Serving gifted students in rural settings. Prufrock Press & National Association of Gifted Children.
Staunton, M. S., & Jaffee, E. M. (2014). Key findings and recommendations from the Coös youth study: Research from the first half of the study (Regional Issue Brief 41). Carsey Research. https://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.379
Street, B. (1993). Culture is a verb: Anthropological aspects of language and cultural process. In D. Graddol, L. Thompson, & M. Bryan (Eds.), Language and culture (pp. 23–43). Multilingual Matters.
Tyler‐Wood, T., & Carri, L. (1993). Verbal measures of cognitive ability: The gifted low SES student’s albatross. Roeper Review, 16(2), 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553550
U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: The case for developing America’s talent. U.S. Government Printing Office.
VanTassel-Baska, J., Avery, L., Struck, J., Feng, A., Bracken, B., Drummond, D., & Stambaugh, T. (2003). The William and Mary classroom observation scales revised. College of William and Mary School of Education Center for Gifted Education. https://education.wm.edu/centers/cfge/_documents/research/athena/cosrform.pdf
Weber, K. (2003). The relationship of interest to internal and external motivation. Communication Research Reports, 20(4), 376–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388837
West Virginia Department of Education. (2019a). County percent needy data for claim date 10/01/2018. https://wvde.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Percent_Needy_2019_CEO_Ungrouped.pdf
West Virginia Department of Education. (2019b). Endorsements eligible to be added to a valid professional teaching certificate by taking a Praxis II content exam effective October 22, 2019. https://wvde.us/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/8C-guidance.pdf
White, S., & Reid, J. (2008). Placing teachers? Sustaining rural schooling through place consciousness in teacher education. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 23(7), 1–11. https://jrre.psu.edu/sites/default/files/2019-08/23-7.pdf
Winter, L. K. (2013). “Where I’m from”: Does strong teacher Appalachian identity impact views of student efficacy? Journal of Appalachian Studies, 19, 124–132. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42635930
Yin, R. (2018). Case study research: Design and methods (6th ed.) Sage.
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Myriah Miller, EdD, Carla Brigandi, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Articles will be published using a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Sharealike license. (For more information on this license, please visit the Creative Commons license page.) Please also note that the authors are explicitly granting permission for Academic Library Services to store a copy of the article in The ScholarShip, ECU's Institutional Repository under the terms of the current ScholarShip license. As a North Carolina agency, ECU contributes copies of all publications to the North Carolina State Archives.
