Identifying and Allocating Resources for Learning Improvement

A Study of Sustainably Improving Rural Schools

Authors

  • Wesley Henry California State University, Monterey Bay

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2019.v9n1p61-73

Keywords:

rural education, rural principals, rural supedrintendents, resource identification, community engagement, school improvement

Abstract

This article investigates efforts by rural superintendents and rural principals to identify and leverage the local resources available to them to support learning improvement agendas within their schools. This study investigates practices within a diverse range of rural schools located in Washington State to understand how resources can be identified and allocated to best support student learning. In addition, this article explores the importance of family and community engagement in administrators' school improvement agendas. The conceptual framework for this study is informed by literature investigating resource allocation for educational improvement. This study was designed to better understand how rural education leaders identify, leverage, and allocate supports and resources, particularly those available within their immediate communities, to meet the needs of their staff and students. The rural schools represented in this study demonstrate trends in student achievement gains, despite challenges facing rural schools, such as increasing economic stratification in rural communities and diseconomies of scale in operating small schools and districts. Administrators meet these challenges by (a) maximizing teacher's instructional time through assuming duties often performed by nonadministrative personnel in other settings, thereby reaffirming the particularly multifaceted nature of rural school leadership; (b) forging formal and informal partnerships within the immediate community and geographic region to support student learning; and (c) leveraging the interconnected nature of rural communities in ways that increase community engagement in schools. Thoughtful community engagement strategies help manage the external politics of resource distribution within schools and ultimately materialize support for student learning.

Author Biography

Wesley Henry, California State University, Monterey Bay

Wesley Henry is an assistant professor at California State University, Monterey Bay, where he serves as the founding faculty for the Department of Education & Leadership's principal preparation program. Wesley started his career as a public high school teacher in Philadelphia, and his current research interests are rooted in rural education leadership and policy, better understanding the professional learning of adults, the role such development can play in setting organizational dynamics within educational settings, and the role of school and community leaders in equity-focused school improvement and community development.

References

Abshier, W. C., Harris, S., & Hopson, M. (2011). Superintendent perspectives of financial survival strategies in small school districts. Rural Educator, 32(3), 1–10.

Adams, J. E., Jr. (2010a). Ambitious learning goals require a new approach to educational resources. In J. E. Adams Jr. (Ed.), Smart money: Using educational resources to accomplish ambitious learning goals (pp. 29–53). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Adams, J. E., Jr. (2010b). Smart money and America’s schools. In J. E. Adams Jr. (Ed.), Smart money: Using educational resources to accomplish ambitious learning goals (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Alsbury, T. L., & Whitaker, K. S. (2015). District superintendents as instructional leaders? In G. Ivory, A. E. Hyle, R. McClellan, & M. Acker-Hocevar (Eds.), Quandaries of the small-district superintendency (pp. 35–54). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363251_4

Arnold, M. L., Newman, J. H., Gaddy, B. B., & Dean, C. B. (2005). A look at the condition of rural education research: Setting a direction for future research. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(6), 1–25.

Ashton, B., & Duncan, H. E. (2012). A beginning rural principal’s toolkit: A guide for success. Rural Educator, 34(1), 1–13.

Bauch, P. A. (2001). School-community partnerships in rural schools: Leadership, renewal, and a sense of place. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje7602_9

Bouck, E. C. (2004). How size and setting impact education in rural schools. Rural Educator, 25(3), 38–42.

Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Allen, L. W. (2006). Preparing principals for high-need rural schools: A central office perspective about collaborative efforts to transform school leaders. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(1), 1–16.

Budge, K. (2006). Rural leaders, rural places: Problem, privilege, and possibility. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 21(13), 1–10.

City, E. (2008). Resourceful leadership: Tradeoffs and tough decisions on the road to school improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Consortium for School Networking. (2015). CoSN’s 2015 annual e-rate and infrastructure survey. Washington, DC: Author.

Cooper, B. S., Fusarelli, L. D., & Carella, V. A. (2000). Career crisis in the school superintendency? The results of a national survey. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.

Corbett, M. (2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.

Dayton, J. (1999). Rural school funding inequities: An analysis of legal, political, and fiscal issues. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 14(3), 142–148.

Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226206851.001.0001

Farmer, T. A. (2009). Unique rural district politics. Rural Educator, 30(2), 29–33.

Hardré, P. L. (2007). Motivating environments: A systemic analysis of four rural high schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(3), 231–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760701263824

Harmon, H. L., & Schafft, K. (2009). Rural school leadership for collaborative community development. Rural Educator, 30(3), 4–9.

Howley, A., Pendarvis, E. D., & Woodrum, A. (2005). The rural school principalship: Promises and challenges. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.

Jacobson, S. L. (1988). The rural superintendency: Reconsidering the administrative farm system. Research in Rural Education, 5(2), 37–42.

Jimerson, L. (2005). Placism in NCLB: How rural children are left behind. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38(3), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680591002588

Johnson, J., Showalter, D., Klein, R., & Lester, C. (2014). Why rural matters 2013–2014: The condition of rural education in the 50 states. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.

Johnson, K. M. (2012). Rural demographic change in the new century: Slower growth, increased diversity. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Carsey Institute.

Jones, K., & Howley, A. (2009). Contextual influences on superintendents’ time usage. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(23), 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v17n23.2009

Kersten, T. A., & Ballenger, J. (2012). School and district relationships. In M. A. Hocevar, J. Ballenger, W. Place, & G. Ivory (Eds.), Snapshots of school leadership in the 21st century: Perils and promises of leading for social justice, school improvement, and democratic community (pp. 147–167). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Kirst, M. W., & Rhodes. L. (2010). Linking education funding with standards-based reform and community-based resources. In J. E. Adams Jr. (Ed.), Smart money: Using educational resources to accomplish ambitious learning goals (pp. 213–233). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Knapp, M. S., Honig, M. I., Plecki, M. L., Portin, B. S., & Copland, M. A. (2014). Learning-focused leadership in action: Improving instruction in schools and districts. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880013

Lamkin, M. L. (2006). Challenges and changes faced by rural superintendents. Rural Educator, 28(1), 17–24.

Lee, J. (2003). Evaluating rural progress in mathematics achievement: Threats to the validity of “adequate yearly progress.” Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(2), 66–77.

Levin, J., Manship, K., Chambers, J., Johnson, J., & Blankenship, C. (2011). Do schools in rural and nonrural districts allocate resources differently? An analysis of spending and staffing patterns in the West Region states (Issues and Answers Report, REL 2011-No. 099). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs

Lochmiller, C. (2015). Political perspectives on resource allocation in rural school districts. In G. Ivory, A. E. Hyle, R. McClellan, & M. Acker-Hocevar (Eds.), Quandaries of the small-district superintendency (pp. 131–151). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137363251_9

Lyson, T. A. (2002). What does a school mean to a community? Assessing the social and economic benefits of schools to rural villages in New York. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 17, 131–137.

Masumoto, M., & Brown-Welty, S. (2009). Case study of leadership practices and school-community interrelationships in high-performing, high-poverty, rural California high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(1), 1–18.

Mathis, W. J. (2003). Financial challenges, adequacy, and equity in rural schools and communities. Journal of Education Finance, 29(2), 119–36.

McGranahan, D. A. (1994). Rural America in the global economy: Socioeconomic trends. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 10(3), 139–148.

Merriam, S. B., (2009). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Miles, K. H., & Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Rethinking the allocation of teaching resources: Some lessons from high-performing schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737020001009

Miles, K. H., & Ferris, K. (2015). Designing schools that work: Organizing resources strategically for student success. Watertown, MA: Education Resource Strategies.

Miles, K. H., & Frank, S. (2008). The strategic school: Making the most of people, time, and money. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Morton, C., & Harmon, H. L. (2011). Challenges and sustainability practices of frontier schools in Montana. Rural Educator, 33(1), 1–14.

Nachtigal, P. M. (1995). Political trends affecting nonmetropolitan America. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 10(3), 161–166.

Pan, D., Rudo, Z. H., Schneider, C. L., & Smith-Hansen, L. (2003). Examination of resource allocation in education: Connecting spending to student performance. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Plecki, M. L., Alejano, C. R., Knapp, M. S., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2006). Allocating resources and creating incentives to improve teaching and learning. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.

Plecki, M., & Knapp, M. (2014). Frameworks and strategies for investing in instructional leadership. In M. S. Knapp, M. I. Honig, M. L. Plecki, B. S. Portin, & M. A. Copland (Eds.), Learning-focused leadership in action: Improving instruction in schools and districts (pp. 123–152). New York, NY: Routledge.

Portin, B. (2005). School-based leadership in the US in an age of reform: What does it take? Education Research and Perspectives, 32(2), 1–23.

Prater, D. L., Bermudez, A. B., & Owens, E. (1997). Examining parental involvement in rural, urban, and suburban schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13, 72–75.

Reaves, W. E. J., & Larmer, W. G. (1996). The effective schools project: School improvement in rural settings through collaborative professional development. Rural Educator, 18(1), 29–33.

Renihan, P., & Noonan, B. (2012). Principals as assessment leaders in rural schools. Rural Educator, 33(3), 1–8.

Showalter, D., Klein, R., Johnson, J., & Hartman, S. (2017). Why rural matters 2015–2016: Understanding the changing landscape. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.

Stapel, C. J., & DeYoung, A. J. (2011). Toward a transdisciplinary rural education research agenda. Rural Educator, 32(3), 29–38.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748

Thorson, G. R., & Edmondson, J. (2000). Making difficult times worse: The impact of per pupil funding formulas on rural Minnesota schools. Mankato, MN: Minnesota State University, Center for Rural Policy and Development.

U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. CCD public school data [Data file]. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch

Washington State Board of Education. (2016). Washington State Achievement Index [Data file]. Retrieved from https://eds.ospi.k12.wa.us/WAI/

Washington State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2018). Washington state report card [Data file]. Retrieved from http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/

Downloads

Published

2019-05-30

How to Cite

Henry, W. (2019). Identifying and Allocating Resources for Learning Improvement: A Study of Sustainably Improving Rural Schools. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 9(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2019.v9n1p61-73